Monday, 28 September 2026Read from twenty-eight well-known files at 05:00 UTCFree · nobody pays to be in it
TheCircular
Every Pool in the consortium, read from its own address.
60 public Pools on twenty-three sites246 adsTwenty-three members, four readersTwo Pools dormantBlock list, version 8
Two new doors
Two apps opened this season with people already in them.
Roomful, for dating, and Familiar Faces, for friendship, keep no Pools. They read the ones curators and people already keep, and each person in them still decides who may write.
The deskCounted from the consortium’s files
Neither app started empty. Roomful and Familiar Faces each publish a well-known file with no Pools in it (§8.3), and each reads the files this paper reads on Mondays. In those files today, Roomful can read eight public dating Pools on eight sites, with sixty people in them, the apps’ own dating Pools among them. Familiar Faces leaves dating out, and can read sixteen public Pools tagged friendship, with seventy-eight people.
A new app used to open to an empty room. A dating app is only as good as the people in it, and the effect is local, so the biggest one in town kept winning and a newcomer had nobody to show. These two could open full because the people were never theirs to hold. Each profile stays on its owner’s page, each Pool is a file its curator keeps, and any client may read a public one (§3.5, §8.3).
Nobody was added. Everyone in those Pools said yes to a curator first (§5.1), and each person’s own rules still decide who may write. Of the sixty in the dating Pools, forty-one take a first message from anyone verified, six only once both people have said so, twelve only from someone who shares a Pool with them and one only from someone a curator vouched for (§7.1, §7.2).
Neither app is paid while anyone is still looking. By their own accounts, nobody pays to be introduced or to see who is interested, and any thanks come after an introduction worked. Both honor this consortium’s block list and the project’s, so an entry made here follows people into both (§7.3). And neither shows an unlisted Pool to anyone who wasn’t given its address, or an invite-only Pool at all (§3.2).
Four Pools went up this week, and the project planned a fifth.
Each one came from its own site’s well-known file. This paper adds no Pools and removes none; it prints what the sites publish.
The desk5 manifests, created 22 to 25 September
Five Pools appeared in the consortium’s files in the seven days to Monday. Four are open on their own sites: Wes Adeyemi’s Door and Sound Crew at Ferry Room Players, Rizal Santos’s Tagalog ↔ English at Correo Lento, Ada Quillon’s Portland, Friday 23 October and Bram de Wit’s Carpool to the Coast at the Board. The fifth, Writers and Researchers, is one of the project’s own, and it is planned: nothing runs at TranquilTech yet, and the people listed in it are invented.
A new Pool is a promise before it is a crowd. The four open ones list seven people between them, and each of them said yes first (§5.1). The smallest, Door and Sound Crew, lists one: Wes Adeyemi, who keeps it.
Four read many kinds of Pool, and dating is one of them: Face Up, Heartwood, Sundial and Card Catalog. Each opens any Pool it may, like a browser opens a page, and keeps shortcuts of its own, Face Up in decks, Heartwood in rooms, Sundial in dials and Card Catalog in drawers; a Pool that fits none opens under its own name. Every card names its Pool, and nobody is shown as open to dating unless their own tags say so. They compete on how they show people. Face Up deals one card at a time, face up; Heartwood sets the whole person on one long card, with the other rooms they belong to; Sundial makes one introduction a day, at the same hour for both people; Card Catalog is a search drawer, filed under every field people chose to fill in.
For dating, each reads the others’ Pools, so the same people turn up in all four. Each keeps a public dating Pool, which any app may read, and 36 of the 53 people in those four Pools are in more than one. By their own accounts, all four read their rivals’ dating Pools; Sundial introduces both ways only inside its own, and one way from the others. The files hold eight public dating Pools today, with sixty people in them. Each person still decides who may write, and leaving one app costs nobody their place in the others (§3.5, §7.2).
Their Pools read this consortium’s block list, so by this paper’s own rule their makers are members now. The Pools run in the classifieds as a directory, not as ads. Familiar Faces (friendship and groups), Bellows (asks and offers) and Threshold (a desk for the people who keep Pools) keep no Pools, so they are readers. Roomful, which reads the files too, is in the story above.
A flyer faded
Chess After Close went quiet, and its members are choosing a new keeper.
The deskThe Board
Amos Whitlock kept it. His own page says: “Started Chess After Close three winters ago. Moved inland in June and has not been back since.” He has taken no curation action since 18 June. Ninety days later, on 16 September, the Pool turned dormant, and the Board’s well-known file says so (§9.1). Nothing in it was deleted.
Theo Lindqvist nominated Priya Raman on 21 September. Priya is elected if at least two-thirds of the active members who answer support her. The Board notes: “Priya plays most Thursdays and has the night staff’s blessing.”
Slack Water 2025 went quiet, and its members are choosing a new keeper.
The deskSlack Water
Marit Halvorsen kept it. Her own page says: “Director of the Slack Water Festival, which eleven months a year is her and a desk above the chandlery. Books the stages and asks the harbor nicely for the parking lot.” She has taken no curation action since 26 June. Ninety days later, on 24 September, the Pool turned dormant, and Slack Water’s well-known file says so (§9.1). Nothing in it was deleted.
Kofi Mensah nominated Birdie Novak on 25 September. Birdie is elected if at least two-thirds of the active members who answer support her. Slack Water notes: “Birdie keeps the 2026 Pool and offered to keep both years.”
The consortium’s block list reached version 8 on Sunday.
The deskPublished 27 September
Two entries went on this week, both for a consent violation. On Saturday, a Pool’s address: free-friends-now.example/pools/everyone.json. Its entry says it “listed profiles that never accepted a handshake.” On Sunday, a curator’s identity: listed-them-anyway@mail.example. Its entry says the curator “submitted other people’s pages, a whole household’s among them, to Pools without asking any of them.” The protocol allows none of it: nobody is in a Pool without their own yes (§5.1).
Any member may propose an entry, and two others must second it. All 55 of the consortium’s public Pools read this list, alongside the project’s own (§7.3), and so do Roomful, Familiar Faces, Bellows and Threshold, which keep no Pools, by their own settings. The project’s five planned Pools read only the project’s list.
What the paper can see. Only memberships in public Pools listed in a well-known file. If anyone named here is also in an unlisted or invite-only Pool, this paper does not know it, and would not say.
Not joined up. Personals, non-monogamy and chosen family are left out of this count, on purpose. Being in one of those columns says nothing about any other, so the paper prints each ad where its owner put it and never lines it up beside their other columns. The personals.
Counted apart. Eight people in the consortium’s Pools also appear in the project’s planned Pools: Ruth Adler, Imani Brooks, Inés Calloway, Rosa Delgado-Park, Obinna Eze, Nadia Farouk, Valeria Ortiz and Oswaldo “Ozzie” Reyes. Those Pools are not open, and their members are invented, so they are not counted above. From the project.
From the projectKindling, published by TranquilTech
The project plans five Pools of its own. None is open yet.
Kindling publishes a well-known file like every site here, and the paper reads it the same way.
The project plans to run its own Pools on Kindling, to support the protocol’s development and its larger mission: curators, builders, readers, the people who would govern it, and the people who write about it. Nothing runs at TranquilTech yet. The people listed in these Pools are invented, so readers can see how each one would work, and every file here says status: active only because the schema has no word for planned (the gap).
The project’s Pools read one block list, the project’s own at blocklist.json, and not the consortium’s (§7.3). To take part in any of them once they open, the curator contact in every one of the five manifests is josh@intellibotique.com.
People who write about social technology, the friendship recession and the open-protocol revival, and want to talk to the curators and builders doing the work.
Kept by the Kindling maintainersSigned in with OAuth
With Mei-Lin Zhou, invented. Three invented members.
The paper reads what each site publishes about itself, from its own address, and nothing else. That leaves some things out on purpose.
Unlisted and invite-only Pools. They are in nobody’s well-known file, so the paper never learns their addresses. It does not guess at addresses, and it would drop such a Pool if a file listed one (§3.2).
Anyone whose page says noindex. Such a page asks to be in no Pool and no registry (§2.7). Today, no file listed one. The paper checks every entry anyway.
Anyone’s own page. The paper prints each person’s parsed profile as their Pool published it, and never fetches the page itself. It copies no photos (§2.5).
Anyone’s mail. A circle in the classifieds is checked against the person’s rules in your browser. Any introduction goes from your client to their address, through the Pool. The paper carries none.
Per site, today
Site
In its file
Printed
Ads
What it keeps out, by its own account
Many Moons
2
2
9
Publishes two Pools. Its own page also describes The Orchard Street Household, unlisted, so it is in no file and never prints.
Hearthhold
2
2
6
Publishes two Pools. Its own page also describes Intentional Co-Parents, unlisted, so it is in no file and never prints.
Late Supper
1
1
1
Publishes one Pool, its matchmakers. Its manifest says “the tables are separate, unlisted Pools”, and its home page describes two of them without a single name. Unlisted Pools are in no well-known file and no registry.
Scattered Light
1
1
3
Publishes one Pool, its stewards. Its stewards vouch newcomers “into a constellation”, in the words of that Pool’s charter, and constellations travel by invitation. It does not say how many there are, and the paper does not guess.
Foul Weather Friends
3
3
14
Publishes three Pools. Its own page also describes The Check-In Circle, unlisted, so it is in no file and never prints.
Midspan
1
1
5
Publishes one Pool. Its own page also describes Midspan Students, invite-only, so it is in no file and never prints.
Seen Work
1
1
2
Publishes one Pool. Its own page also describes Seen Work: Harbor Trades, unlisted, so it is in no file and never prints.
The Board
7
7
20
Publishes all it keeps, one of them dormant. Its page tells of a neighbor whose own page says noindex: no Pool lists him, and this paper would not print him if one did.
Ferry Room Players
5
5
12
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
Correo Lento
4
4
12
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
The Circular
1
1
4
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
Drip Line
4
4
21
Publishes four Pools. Its own page also describes Thursday Night: Women and Nonbinary Climbers, unlisted, so it is in no file and never prints.
Ada Quillon
4
4
20
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
Rain Check
6
6
41
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
Slack Water
5
5
43
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account, one of them dormant.
Wren’s List
1
1
4
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
Second Tide Books
1
1
4
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
Queer Harbor
0
0
0
Lists no Pools. Its keeper’s own page says the bar’s dating list is unlisted, because the regulars asked. That is as it should be: an unlisted Pool travels by hand, from the bar and from friends, not by file.
Face Up
1
1
directory
Publishes its own Pool. They are set as a directory, with counts and a link to the app, not as ads.
Heartwood
2
2
directory
Publishes its two own Pools. They are set as a directory, with counts and a link to the app, not as ads.
Sundial
1
1
directory
Publishes its own Pool. They are set as a directory, with counts and a link to the app, not as ads.
Card Catalog
1
1
directory
Publishes its own Pool. They are set as a directory, with counts and a link to the app, not as ads.
Cape Tarrow Alumni
1
1
5
Publishes every Pool it keeps, by its own account.
Roomful
0
0
0
Keeps no Pools, and its file says so. It reads other sites’ Pools, as this paper does.
Familiar Faces
0
0
0
Keeps no Pools, and its file says so. It reads other sites’ Pools, as this paper does.
Bellows
0
0
0
Keeps no Pools, and its file says so. It reads other sites’ Pools, as this paper does.
Threshold
0
0
0
Keeps no Pools, and its file says so. It reads other sites’ Pools, as this paper does.
Kindling (the project)
5
5
20
Publishes five planned Pools. The paper prints them as planned.
IndexThe twenty-eight sites this paper reads
The sites this paper reads, with their role in the consortium, operators, Pool counts and files
Site
Role
Operator
Pools
Links
Many Moons
Member
Many Moons, a community for consensual non-monogamy in the harbor counties
The consortium is the twenty-three organizations whose Pools read its block list, this paper among them. Twenty-two show it in their manifests’ block list subscriptions. Queer Harbor, whose file lists no Pools, is on the desk’s own roll. Roomful, Familiar Faces, Bellows and Threshold honor the list too, by their own published settings, and keep no Pools: they are readers, not members. The project is read like any other site and is not a member: its Pools read only its own list.